This is the text extract for Summary – Cost utility analysis of the lipid modifying agents, browse documents here.
1997 Summary - cost utility analysis of the lipid modifying agents Net benefits of LMAs The benefits of LMAs can be measured in quality-adjusted life years saved (QALYS), which combine fatal with non-fatal events. Net quality-adjusted life years saved comprise: 1. QALY gains from net all-cause premature deaths prevented 2. QALY gains from non-fatal CHD events prevented 3. QALY losses from side effects/adverse effects of LMA pharmaceuticals and programmes. In general, variations in QALY gains due to LMAs between age/sex/CHD-status groups and LMA class reflect the interplay between: • absolute risk (all-cause premature mortality and non-fatal CHD events), • effectiveness (risk reduction) of LMAs (varying by class of LMA for all-cause deaths) • life expectancy, and • impact of side effects (particularly with ‘fibrates’). The degree to which patients might benefit from LMA programmes varies considerably, according to age/gender, CHD status and LMA class. In general however, these follow a gradient, where relative youth, presence of pre-existing CHD with high baseline total cholesterol, and use of ‘statins’ confers the greatest potential health gain. Unfortunately there are no trial data available to assess the extent of benefits from treating NHF groups A2, A3 and A1,3-4 (genetic lipoprotein disorders; diabetic nephropathy; nonCHD cardiovascular disease). Because these groups are similarly at high absolute risk of further cardiovascular events, many clinicians presume them to have benefits similar to patients with CHD. However, this assumes that lipid lowering agents are equally effective at preventing events in these groups as in trials using CHD patients - for which there are few supporting data.. For other groups (ie CHD patients, at-risk patients), overall LMA programme QALY gains in general increase with CHD risk. QALYS are highest for patients with pre-existing CHD with higher baseline total cholesterol. Statin QALYS in general are three times that of fibrates. Within statins, QALYS for those with CHD with total cholesterol >=7.5 mmol/l aged 35-69 years are 4 times that of 70-84 year old 10-14% risk patients:
5-year QALY gains/person from LMAs, ages 35-69
1.6
1.4
5-year QALY gains/person from statins, by age
statins fibrates
1.6 1.4 ages 35-69 1.2 ages 70-84
1.2
1.0 QALYs (TTO)
0.8
QALYs (TTO)
1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.2 0.0
past CHD >=7.5
past CHD 6.5-7.4
past CHD 5.5-6.4
(past CHD <5.5)
at risk >=20%
past CHD >=7.5
past CHD 6.5-7.4
past CHD 5.5-6.4
(past CHD <5.5)
fam.xanthomas
at risk >=20%
Men aged 35-39 with pre-existing CHD and total cholesterol >=7.5 mmol/l have the highest undiscounted QALY gains, with 2.05 QALYs each for 5 year’s treatment with statins, ie around two years extra quality life for each year treated. This is 8 times that of men aged 65P1-5-0 #26220 June 1997
at risk 10-14%
at risk15-19%
at risk 10-14%
at risk15-19%
fam.xanth
0.0
1
69 “at risk” with 10-14% 5-year risk, who have 0.25 QALYs/person for the same treatment, ie three months. The same men treated with fibrates have -0.02 QALYS, ie a net loss of around 7 days quality-adjusted life for one year’s treatment.
Calculated 5-year net QALYS/person using statins only
2.30
net QALYs gained per person over 5 years (TTO method)
1.80
1.30
0.80
0.30
at risk 10-14% f am.xanth pre-exist ing CHD, cholesterol <5.5 mmol/l pre-exist ing CHD, cholesterol 6.5-7.4 mmol/ l (zero QALY change, ie no net benef it nor loss) at risk 15-19% at risk >=20% pre-exist ing CHD, cholesterol 5.5-6.4 mmol/l pre-exist ing CHD, cholesterol >=7.5 mmol/ l
(0.20) M35-39 M40-44 M45-49 M50-54 M55-59 M60-64 M65-69
M70-74
M75-79
M80-84
F35-39
F40-44
F45-49
F50-54
F55-59
F60-64
F65-69
F70-74
F75-79
F60-64 F65-69 F70-74
Calculated 5-year net QALYS/person using fibrates only
2.30
discounted net QALYS/person over 5 years (TTO method) 2.30
Discounted 5-year net QALYS/person using statins only (PV of undisc QALYS @11.4%)
net QALYs gained per person over 5 years (TTO method)
1.80
at risk 10-14% fam.xanth pre-existing CHD, cholesterol <5.5 mmol/l pre-existing CHD, cholesterol 6.5-7.4 mmol/l (zero QALY change, ie no net benefit nor loss)
at risk 15-19% at risk >=20% pre-existing CHD, cholesterol 5.5-6.4 mmol/l pre-existing CHD, cholesterol >=7.5 mmol/l
1.80
1.30
1.30
0.80
0.80
0.30
0.30
at risk 10-14% f am.xant h pre-exist ing CHD, cholesterol <5.5 mmol/ l pre-exist ing CHD, cholesterol 6.5-7.4 mmol/ l (zero QA LY change, ie no net benef it nor loss) at risk 15-19% at risk >=20% pre-existing CHD, cholesterol 5.5-6.4 mmol/l pre-existing CHD, cholesterol >=7.5 mmol/ l
(0.20) M35-39 M40-44 M45-49 M50-54 M55-59 M60-64 M65-69 M70-74 M75-79 M80-84 F35-39 F40-44 F45-49 F50-54 F55-59 F60-64 F65-69 F70-74 F75-79 F80-84
(0.20) M35-39 M40-44 M45-49 M50-54 M55-59 M60-64 M65-69
M70-74
M75-79
M80-84
F35-39
F40-44
F45-49
F50-54
F55-59
F75-79
F80-84
F80-84
Net benefits of LMAs: priority rankings Age/sex/CHD subpopulations can be ranked according to QALY gains from LMA drugs and programmes. Given the sizes and likely Rx costs of treating these eligible subpopulations, patients are grouped according to QALY rankings and likely cumulative Rx costs. This shows a generalised “wave” pattern for which patient groups would gain most benefit for any level of spending:
P1-5-0 #26220 June 1997
2
Statin priorities by QALY gains: cumulative annual costs ($ millions)
past CHD, cholesterol >=7.5 past CHD, cholesterol 6.5-7.4 past CHD, cholesterol 5.5-6.4 past CHD, cholesterol <5.5 genetic at risk, >=20% at risk, 15-19% M35-39 M40-44 M45-49 M50-54 M55-59 M60-64 M65-69 M70-74 M75-79 M80-84 F35-39 F40-44 F45-49 F50-54 F55-59 F60-64 F65-69 F70-74 F75-79 F80-84 at risk, 10-14% $20 - $30 $10 - $20 $- - $10
Ignoring groups A2, A3, and A1,3-4 (genetic lipoprotein disorders, diabetic nephropathy, and non-CHD cardiovascular diseases), then at current spending levels and prices for statins ($12.5 million/year, around $1300/patient/year), best benefit is gained for 1. CHD and total cholesterol >= 7.5 mmol/l aged <70 years, and 2. CHD and total cholesterol >= 6.5 mmol/l aged <60 years. This differs somewhat from current special authority criteria of CHD >=7.0 mmol/l at any age. For an extra $25 million total spending (ie total $37.5 million at current prices), or nil extra spending (ie current $12.5 million) if prices were to decrease to one-third, best benefit would be gained for: 1. CHD and total cholesterol >= 7.0 mmol/l at any age (ie 35-84 years old), as currently authorised, plus 2. CHD and total cholesterol 6.5-7.0 mmol/l at any age, 3. CHD and total cholesterol 5.5-6.5 mmol/l aged <65 years, 4. CHD and total cholesterol 5.5-6.4 aged <60 years, 5. >15% 5-year risk (groups B and C) aged <45 years. Again, this differs from the proposed criteria of CHD >= 6.0 mmol/l at any age (with specialist referral >75 years). However, estimates of benefit across age/CHD risk groups are reasonably uncertain, and it may be too impractical to juggle age as well as cholesterol and risk. Note that including groups A2, A3, and A1,3-4 changes this pattern, since if statins were equally effective in these groups, they would have similar-sized benefits as CHD patients.
P1-5-0 #26220 June 1997
3
Priorities for statin Rx, based on QALY benefits
key: first priority, ie if up to $13.5m available at current statin prices second priority, ie if up to $24m available (current prices) third priority, ie up to $37.5m at current statin prices, $13.5m at 1/3 of current price CHD, cholesterol >=7.5 CHD, cholesterol 6.5-7.4 CHD, cholesterol 5.5-6.4 CHD, cholesterol <5.5
at risk, 15-19%
35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84
Proposed priorities for statin Rx, compared with "ideal"
key: current special authority criteria (any age) additional from proposed SA criteria additional from proposed SA criteria, with review >70 years and specialist referral >75 greatest benefit at current statins spending at current price ($13.5m, $1073/pt pa) greatest benefit at proposed statins spending at current price ($24m, $1073/pt pa) greatest benefit at current statin spending but 1/3 of current price CHD, tc 7.0-7.4 CHD, tc 6.5-6.9 CHD, tc 6.0-6.4 CHD, tc 5.5-5.9 at risk, 15-19% at risk, 10-14%
genetic
age-group
35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84
Net benefits of LMAs: sensitivity analyses “Base case” QALYS are sensitive to varying the various assumptions contained in the model. These include: • varying absolute risk • varying relative risk reduction • varying utility values (ie QALY scores) for health states prevented or side effects:
P1-5-0 #26220 June 1997
genetic
age-group
at risk, >=20%
CHD, tc >=7.5
CHD, tc <5.5
at risk, 10-14%
at risk, >=20%
4
SENSITIVITY ANALYSES: NHF groups A&B 35-69 yrs with LMAs: 5-year QALYS per person variation (TTO) from base case 54% 1.03 -69% 0.21 0.67 0.60 -10% 0.64 -4% 0.01 -99% 1.14 70% 0.41 -39% 0.67 1% 0.48 -28% 0.59 -12% 0.66 -1% 0.70 5% 0.61 -9% 1.03 390% -0.01 -107% -0.18 -187% 0.32 51% 1.23 20% 0.60 -10% 0.63 -5% 0.61 -9% 0.58 -13%
statins only fibrates only base case (fibrates+statins) low total mortality high total mortality lower 95% CL for RRR upper 95% CL for RRR RRR for pCHD constant by t.chol RRR varies by age only RRR varies by age/sex only constant RRR (from 4S) low CHD QALY-gain value (AUS-TASK) high CHD QALY-gain value (0.2) high fibrate SE QALY loss (0.05) fibrates: max Rx effect fibrates: min Rx effect fibrates: min Rx effect + high SEs fibrates :high CHD QALY value statins: high CHD QALY value base discount rate (11.4%) 5% discount rate 10% discount rate 15% discount rate
Overall, there is reasonable uncertainty as to the size and precision of benefits from lipidlowering agents. This is due to the magnitude and extent of the assumptions made, because of scarce information. For example, for NHF A&B aged 35-69, QALYS are -99% higher and 80% lower than the base case when upper or lower RRR confidence are combined with high or low CHD utility values and mortality estimates. Out of all variables, the model is most sensitive to precisely how effective treatment is. Applying lower 95% confidence limits for RRRs causes NHF group A&B QALYS to decrease by -99%, whereas upper RRR 95% confidence limits cause a 70% increase. If RRRs for pre-existing CHD do not vary according to baseline total cholesterol, then CHD QALYS are more uniform with a narrower spread between levels of risk. Varying the assumptions about fibrate effectiveness on all-cause mortality significantly affect overall LMA QALYS, with benefits varying between nil and those of statins. Combining poor fibrate effectiveness with high side effect disutilities causes net QALY losses (ie side effects outweigh any benefits). Cost-effectiveness The model’s cost-benefit ratios are based around PHARMAC’s NZ$24,648 per QALY calculated for the 4S population. This calculation discounted both costs and benefits at 11.4%, with life expectancy discounting to 7.0 years. Patterns of cost-effectiveness in general follow inversely those of benefits - apart from differences in overall LMA cost-effectiveness due to effects of differences between fibrates and statins. Cost-benefit ratios (ie costs per QALYS) increase with CHD risk. In theory it will cost $31,194 /QALYS for patients for NHF groups A&B aged 35-69. In practice, these costs/QALYS rise substantially once Rx continuation rates are accounted for, e.g. rising 100% to $62,345 /QALYS for NHF groups A&B. The cost component in net theoretical costs/QALYS include opportunity savings (offsets) from hospitalisations prevented through CHD events no longer occurring, from effective LMA programmes. These net costs/QALYS are slightly below gross costs/QALYS (ie which
P1-5-0 #26220 June 1997
5
account for Rx spending only). For NHF groups A&B aged 35-69, gross cost/benefits are 17% greater than net at $36,531 /QALYS.
$450,000 $400,000 $60,000 $350,000 $300,000 cost/QALY ($) $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $20,000 $100,000 $10,000 $50,000 $fam.xanth $past CHD >=7.5 past CHD 6.5-7.4 past CHD 5.5-6.4 (past CHD <5.5) at risk >=20% at risk 10-14% at risk15-19% fam.xanth potential actual cost/QALY ($) $50,000
Cost:benefit ratios for LMAs, ages 35-69, potential vs actual use of fibrates/statins
$70,000
Cost:benefit ratios for statins, ages 35-69, incl/excl hospital offsets
incl hospital etc offsets Rx cost only, no offsets
$40,000
$30,000
past CHD >=7.5
past CHD 6.5-7.4
past CHD 5.5-6.4
(past CHD <5.5)
at risk >=20%
As with QALY benefits, LMA cost/benefits vary considerably (by age/gender, CHD status and LMA class) but in general follow an age/CHD status gradient. Overall LMA programme cost-benefits in general increase with age and with CHD risk. For NHF groups A&B aged 3569, statins are about equally cost-effective than fibrates at $27,231 and $36,414 respectively.
Cost:benefit ratios for possible LMA programme (potential use, combination of fibrates and statins, ages 35-69)
$160,000
$350,000
Cost:benefit ratios for LMAs (potential use of fibrates or statins, ages 35-69)
$300,000
$140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $fam.xanthomas
fibrates $250,000 cost/QALY ($) statins
cost/QALY ($)
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
past CHD >=7.5
past CHD 6.5-7.4
past CHD 5.5-6.4
(past CHD <5.5)
at risk >=20%
at risk 10-14%
at risk15-19%
past CHD >=7.5
past CHD 6.5-7.4
past CHD 5.5-6.4
(past CHD <5.5)
$fam.xanthomas
at risk >=20%
CHD status
With statins (as an example), cost-benefits vary widely, from as low as $14,542 / QALYS for men aged 35-39 with pre-existing CHD with total cholesterol >= 7.5 mmol/l, compared to $78,152 for women aged 70-74 with 10-14% 5-year risk. Similar variation occurs with fibrates, but many cost-benefits are incalculable because of net negative benefits.
Cost-benefits of statin use, by age/sex/CHD status
$120,000
$100,000 discounted 5-yr cost per QALYS
at risk 10-14% at risk 15-19% fam.xanth
$80,000
$60,000 at risk >=20% $40,000 pre-existing CHD, cholesterol <5.5 mmol/l pre-existing CHD, cholesterol 5.5-6.4 mmol/l pre-existing CHD, cholesterol 6.5-7.4 mmol/l pre-existing CHD, cholesterol >=7.5 mmol/l
$20,000
$-
age/sex-group
P1-5-0 #26220 June 1997
at risk 10-14%
at risk15-19%
at risk 10-14%
at risk15-19%
6
Marginal costs/QALYS of extending statin access show a similar pattern of decreasing valuefor-money as CHD risk and benefits decrease: • Treating all younger patients with CHD (group A1:1-2) currently eligible for statins (CHD with cholesterol >=7.0 mmol/l, ages 35-69) potentially would gain 5,092 QALYS for $19,198,546 costs (including mark-ups, excluding GST), at $19,502 /potential QALY (compared with treating nobody). • Widening access to CHD patients aged 35-69 with total cholesterol 6.0-7.0 mmol/l would potentially gain a further 6,408 QALYS for $32,403,694 extra costs, at $26,865 /potential QALY for each of the additional QALYs gained (compared with treating just CHD ages 35-69 cholesterol >7.0 mmol/l). • Extending access to patients with CHD (A1,1-2) with cholesterol >6.0 mmol/l aged 70-84 would potentially gain a further 6,598 QALYS for $39,608,844 extra costs, at $31,944 /potential QALY for each of the additional QALYs gained (compared with treating just CHD cholesterol 6.0-7.0 mmol/l ages 35-69). • Extending access to patients aged 35-69 with CHD and total cholesterol 5.5-6.0 mmol, or in groups A2 or B would potentially gain a further 838 QALYS for $5,647,422 extra costs, at $35,265 /potential QALY for each of the additional QALYs gained (compared with treating just CHD cholesterol > 6.0 mmol/l ages 70-84). • Widening access to patients aged 35-69 in groups C and D or with CHD with cholesterol < 5.5 mmol/l would potentially gain a further 1,075 QALYS for $12,631,916 extra costs, at $57,046 /potential QALY for each of the additional QALYs gained (compared with treating just those aged 35-69 with CHD cholesterol 5.5-6.0 mmol/l or in groups A2 and B). • Extending to all other NHF patients, ie group E aged 35-69 and those aged 70-84 in groups B to E or A1:1-2 with cholesterol < 6.0 mmol/l, would potentially gain a only further 44 QALYS for $31,849,380 extra costs, at an expensive $292,761 /potential QALY for each of the additional QALYs gained (compared with treating just those aged 35-69 in groups C and D or with CHD cholesterol < 5.5 mmol/). (Note that likely costs, will be lower, especially in year one, eg around $10,438,026 (including mark-ups, excluding GST) for CHD patients aged 35-69 with total cholesterol 6.07.0 mmol/l)
Statin marginal costs and benefits, current prices
Rx costs (ex manuf) potential need likely demand, year 1 potential benefits total undiscounted 1-year QALYS potential (0% discont) A1:1-2 tc>7 aged 35-69 A1:1-2 tc6-7 aged 35-69 A1:1-2 tc>6 aged 70-84 A1:1-2 tc5.5-6, A2, B aged 35-69 C,D,A1:1-2 tc<5.5 aged 35-69 E aged 35-69; A1:1-2 tc<6, B-E aged 70-84 $19,198,546 $32,403,694 $39,608,844 $5,647,422 $12,631,916 $31,849,380 $10,438,026 $17,621,084 $4,831,611 $1,875,676 $404,134 $483,887 5,092 6,408 6,598 838 1,075 44 $19,502 $26,865 $31,944 $35,265 $57,046 $292,761 costs/QALYS actual (with 1-year discontinuations) base (33% discont) $28,336 $39,272 $43,147 $56,452 $98,448 $459,068 best (15% discont) $21,772 $28,733 $34,819 $41,749 $74,569 $274,882 worst (65% discont) $52,874 $69,779 $84,561 $101,390 $181,097 $667,570
P1-5-0 #26220 June 1997
7
Marginal cost/QALYS of statins, at current prices
A1:1-2 tc>7 aged 35-69
$28,336
A1:1-2 tc6-7 aged 35-69
$39,272
A1:1-2 tc>6 aged 70-84
$43,147
A1:1-2 tc5.5-6, A2, B aged 3569
$56,452
C,D,A1:1-2 tc<5.5 aged 35-69
$98,448
m arginal costs/QALYS
Marginal cost/QALYS of statins, at current prices
$19,502 $28,336 $26,865 $39,272 $31,944 $43,147 $35,265 $56,452 $57,046 $98,448 $292,761 $459,068 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000 $400,000 $450,000 $500,000 $50,000
A1:1-2 tc>7 aged 35-69
potential actual
A1:1-2 tc6-7 aged 35-69
A1:1-2 tc>6 aged 70-84 A1:1-2 tc5.5-6, A2, B aged 3569 C,D,A1:1-2 tc<5.5 aged 35-69 E aged 35-69; A1:1-2 tc<6, B-E aged 70-84 $-
m arginal costs/QALYS
If statin prices were to decrease to one-third of current, ie $1.05/day, then costs/QALYS would improve to extremely cost-beneficial levels: • Low cost treatment of all younger patients with CHD (group A1:1-2) currently eligible for statins (CHD with cholesterol >=7.0 mmol/l, ages 35-69) potentially would cost $6,875,341 , at a mere $4,493 /potential QALY (compared with treating nobody, and compared with $26,865 /potential QALY for the same group at current satin costs). • Low-cost widening access to CHD patients aged 35-69 with total cholesterol 6.0-7.0 mmol/l would potentially cost a further $11,604,339 , at $6,184 /potential QALY for each of the additional QALYs gained (compared with treating just CHD ages 35-69 cholesterol >7.0 mmol/l, and compared with $31,944 /potential QALY for the same group at current satin costs). • etc. These cost/QALYS compare favourably with other extremely cost-beneficial interventions, such as $8,419 for coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) for left main vessel disease.
P1-5-0 #26220 June 1997
$100,000
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
$80,000
$90,000
$-
8
Marginal costs and benefits, low-price statins
Rx costs (ex manuf) potential need A1:1-2 tc>7 aged 35-69 = current A1:1-2 tc6-7 aged 35-69 = proposed A1:1-2 tc>6 aged 70-84 A1:1-2 tc5.5-6, A2, B aged 35-69 C,D,A1:1-2 tc<5.5 aged 35-69 E aged 35-69; A1:1-2 tc<6, B-E aged 70-84 $6,875,341 $11,604,339 $14,184,632 $2,022,442 $4,523,714 $11,405,830 likely demand, year 1 $3,738,043 $6,310,424 $1,730,286 $671,713 $144,728 $173,289 potential benefits total undiscounted 1-year QALYS 5,092 6,408 6,598 838 1,075 44 costs/QALYS potential $4,493 $6,184 $7,448 $8,614 $12,303 $84,064 (current statin prices) cost/potential QALYS $19,502 $26,865 $31,944 $35,265 $57,046 $292,761 actual (with 1likely demand, year year 1 discontinuations) $6,529 $9,041 $10,060 $13,789 $21,233 $131,818 $10,438,026 $17,621,084 $4,831,611 $1,875,676 $404,134 $483,887
Marginal cost/potential QALYS of statins, low price
A1:1-2 tc>7 aged 35-69 = similar to currently eligible** A1:1-2 tc6-7 aged 35-69 = proposed eligible (as in table 1) A1:1-2 tc>6 aged 70-84 = proposed but older A1:1-2 tc5.5-6, A2, B aged 3569 $4,493 $19,502 $6,184 $26,865 $7,448 $31,944 $8,614 $35,265 $12,303 $57,046 $1.05/day current Rx price
C,D,A1:1-2 tc<5.5 aged 35-69
(CABG for left main vessle disease) $-
$8,419
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
m arginal costs/QALYS
Again, the model is variably sensitive to a number of certain assumptions. Pharmaceutical price joins treatment effectiveness as important variables influencing results:
SENSITIVITY ANALYSES: NHF groups A&B 35-69 yrs with LMAs: 5-year QALYS/person (TTO) statins only fibrates only base case (fibrates+statins) low total mortality high total mortality lower 95% CL for RRR upper 95% CL for RRR RRR for pCHD constant by t.chol RRR varies by age only RRR varies by age/sex only constant RRR (from 4S) low CHD QALY-gain value (AUS-TASK) high CHD QALY-gain value (0.2) high fibrate SE QALY loss (0.05) fibrates: max Rx effect fibrates: min Rx effect fibrates: min Rx effect + high SEs fibrates :high CHD QALY value statins: high CHD QALY value low statin price base discount rate (11.4%) 5% discount rate 10% discount rate 15% discount rate 1.03 0.21 0.67 0.60 0.64 0.01 1.14 0.41 0.67 0.48 0.59 0.66 0.70 0.61 1.03 -0.01 -0.18 0.32 1.23 0.67 0.60 0.63 0.61 0.58 $ $ $ 29,927 31,257 32,588 -4% 0.2% 4% $ $ statins discounted cost:benefit ratios fibrates $ $ $ $ total 27,231 36,414 variation from base case -12.7% 16.7% 0% 10% 4% -40% 221% -1% 38% 13% 1% -5% 10% -83%
$ 27,231
$ 36,414
$ 31,194 $ 34,435 $ 32,596 negl QALYS $ 18,749 $ 100,050 $ 30,963 $ 43,186 $ 35,156 $ 31,387 $ 29,677 $ 34,285 $ 6,195 net QALY loss net QALY loss $ 21,694 $ 23,346 $ 24,235
$ 8,188
$ 36,414
Decreasing stain prices by one-third decreases NHF group A&B aged 35-69 overall cost/QALYS by -22% to reach $24,261 (comprising unchanged $36,436 for fibrates but only $8,188 for statins). A 5% discount rate decreases NHF A&B aged 35-69 costs/QALYS by 4% to reach $29,927 , whereas a 15% discount rate increases costs/QALYS by 4% to reach $32,588 .
P1-5-0 #26220 June 1997
$60,000
-40% -14% -22%
9
P1-5-0 #26220 June 1997
10
Metadata
Title
Summary – Cost utility analysis of the lipid modifying agents
Abstract
1997 Summary – cost utility analysis of the lipid modifying agents. The benefits of LMAs can be measured in quality-adjusted life years saved (QALYS), which combine fatal with non-fatal events.
Page 1
Note
This text has been extracted from the source PDF document.
Also available as plain text.
Please contact webmaster to discuss alternative format options.